Barack Obama, Martti Ahtisaari, Al Gore, Muhammad Yunus, Mohamed ElBaradei and the list goes on. A total of 97 individuals and 20 Organisations have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize since 1901. Among the Nobel Prize recipients, some have made remarkable contributions to restore peace in the world and some have created the environment to check direct confrontations leading to serious conflicts. Dalai Lama and Aung San Suu Kyi got the peace prize for their non violence approach while Al Gore received the prize for his initiative for climate change and Yunus for improving the lives of poor people of Bangladesh. So the Peace Prize is awarded on varied reasons.
Nepal’s government has recommended the name of Girija Prasad Koirala for the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in ending the bloody conflicts of the Maoists that claimed the lives of more than 14,000 people in Nepal, and peaceful exit of the monarchy that ruled the Himalayan nation for over 240 years.
Why does he deserve the Peace Prize?
Peaceful End of Monarchy & Insurgency
The most significant achievements of Koirala in Nepal’s political history is abolishing monarchy peacefully and bringing the Maoists to the mainstream politics ending the decade long insurgency which claimed the lives of more than 14,000, injured thousands of people and nearly collapsed the economy of the country.
The monarchy of Nepal exit out of the political scene despite its strong grip in the Nepal army. Koirala played the game for this peaceful departure of the 240 year old institution, which was the source of instability of Nepal and enemy to democracy. First, he insisted the revival of the parliament then cut the links of the Nepal army with the palace and created rosy road for democracy.
Prior to it, Koirala had held talks with the Maoists when he was not in power and the rebels were declared terrorist. He did not care his political life while holding talks with this “terrorist” declared group. Even holding talks with them could be considered aligning with the terrorists. India, USA and other countries had also declared them terrorist so there was the possibility of serious threat to any political party leaders to be accused of being a terrorist and face the consequences. But Koirala did not care.
Koirala also convinced the UML and other major political parties on his agenda of bringing the Maoists to the peace process and signed a peace deal ending ten year long conflict- the biggest conflict in the history of Nepal. Koirala had held talks through intermediaries when he was in power. His assessment was that one of the groups of the Maoists was ready to hold talks for the sake of democracy with the government while the other which was closed to the Palace was against.
This was not the first time that Koirala had initiated talks with the Maoists. Speaking from a public programme in Kathmandu just a few days before the dissolution of the parliament, Koirala made an open request to the Maoists to hold talks with the political parties represented in the parliament. Immediately after his request, Maoists said that they were ready to hold talks with the parties- not with the government. But now ousted King Gyanendra dissolved the parliament ending the resolution of the conflicts forever and invited his own destruction. However, Koirala fulfilled his goal. He brought the Maoists to the parliament, he led the government including the Maoists and he held election peacefully. Once elected to the parliament, the Maoists are obliged to follow peaceful democratic process. This is a great achievement.
Adherence to Democracy
Girija Prasad Koirala always adhered to the principles of democratic values and norms despite the difficulties he himself, his family and his party- the Nepali Congress- faced since his childhood. His unwavering struggle for democracy and its values makes him the fitting candidate for the prize. He has struggled for the sake of democracy since his childhood. Though he is the brother of BP Koirala, the first elected prime minister of Nepal, Girija has made history himself even without connecting his name to his family or friends. He was behind the movement of the labourers of the first factory of Nepal- Jute mills. He struggled since the dictatorial regime of the Ranas and then kings. Koirala struggled to end Rana regime, then his struggled continued with the Kings- Tribhuvan, Mahendra, Birendra and Gyanendra. He never compromised against democracy. Koirala is perhaps the first person in the democratic history of the world where he has struggled with four kings for democracy. He never compromised for anything for the cause of democracy. He held talks with the Kings. He bargained and threatened but never compromised. His sole goal of struggle was- full- fledged democracy.
Commitment to Peace and Non-violence
His zeal for peace and non violence is never questioned. When security personnel resorted to Lathi charge and fired some rounds of bullets to control the crowds of democrats in Kathmandu during the anti Gyanendra demonstration, the octogenarian leader was injured. He fainted. People saw him bleeding in the nose. His supporters wanted to take revenge and continue the protest even taking weapons if need be. He did not allow them to continue protest saying the situation could be violent. Thousands of people came down to the streets across the country during the climax of popular movement demanding the end of monarchy, Koirala cancelled the demonstrations fearing the demonstrations could be violent and uncontrollable. He cancelled the Satyagraha programme after the mysterious bomb explosions killed some people in Kathmandu.
Despite the harsh measure adopted by the dictatorial regimes of the Kings, he always adopted the policy of non violence. The struggle for democracy remained peaceful in most of the cases of Nepal. Nepali Congress waged armed rebellions to end the authoritarian rule of Mahendra, who not only massacred the nascent democracy of the Himalayan nation and plunged the nation into the crisis but also dissolved the first elected parliament, sacked the popularly elected prime minister and imposed autocratic rules closing the doors of freedom of the people. Despite his harsh and cruel suppression of the democratic movement, the Congress party adopted peaceful struggles to end his rule.
When there was armed struggled against the monarchy, it was directly targeted to the king- not to the general public. Not a single innocent person was killed by the Nepali Congress. The armed rebellion was to end the monarchy rule in Nepal. The confrontation was directly with the king and his army, who supported the king. The 30 year of struggle against the King during the Panchayat system remained peaceful. It was not like the killing of mostly innocent people during the 1996- 2006 Maoists insurgency.
Firm in Purpose
After Gyanendra dissolved parliament and declared direct rule, Koirala relentlessly advocated and push forward the one point demand: “revival of the parliament.” Not a single political figure neither from his own party- the Nepali Congress- nor CPN, UML had said so. The parliament should get full-fledged time to complete its tenure and parliament should have the rights to take decision on important issues, was his logic. He succeeded. The revival of the parliament to end the conflict peacefully being within the constitutional framework was very important. He did.
Koirala has never deviated from his struggle to restore democracy in Nepal. He was firm to the purpose of democracy and came to the streets immediately after the massacre of democracy in 1960s. His struggle continued until democracy was restored in 1990. Even after the restoration of democracy he always warned saying there was threat of the King, who could end democracy at any time.
No to Monarchy
He never compromised with monarchy on the issue of democracy. Though he was humiliated, he was made isolated; he did not cease the struggle to end monarchy.
His uncompromising policy for the sake of democracy was also clearly revealed when CPN, UML decided to support the king saying the “regression of the king has been half rectified.” His party was split. A sizeable number of his party cadres had joined Sher Bahadur Deuba led party and government and the main party the UML also joined with Deuba and formed the government giving up the street protest. Koirala and his party was left alone in the street in the fight against then King Gyanendra. There were only smaller parties: Nepal Majdoor Kisan Party and United Peoples Front. These were also very small parties with less than a dozen MPs and all were Communist parties. There was the support of a few people. Only a handful of people could be seen in the demonstration. But he continued never being deviated from his declared goal of democracy. Koirala continued the struggle. Other UML and Deuba led Congress party came again to join his struggle only when the king sacked their government.
Able Leader
Koirala was the consensus candidate when parliament was restored. He was the unanimous candidate for prime minister for Maoists, UML and other parties. He led the first government including the Maoists after the parliament was restored. He is the first prime minister to take over the role of head of state because of his able leadership.
When Koirala said that the victory for democracy is the victory of all. There was hooting and sloganeering against Koirala but he was firm in his statement. That came to be true later when royalists became prime ministers one after another. After the revival of the parliament and success of the popular movement, Koirala went to the palace to take oath with then King Gyanendra , there was protest, but he was firm and followed the constitutional provision. There could be confrontation with the palace and nation could plunge again into the mires of conflicts. But he sensed that possibility and followed constitutional procedures and following that he drowned monarchy into the pages of history.
Leaders with ability do not make statement according to the slogans of the crowds, but they do what their declared policy is, otherwise it becomes anarchical party like some other party leaders, who say or agree on some point and change their statement when they are in crowds. Koirala is the only strong leader in Nepal’s modern history who translated his words into action. He challenged the king and threatened not to weaken democracy. There is no need to explain why Koirala is the only strong leader as we have seen at least the modern time prime ministers of Nepal and their abilities and leadership. He did what he said. His actions were supported by his statement. So he is an able leader.
Nepal’s Face
Koirala is the most trusted and honoured leader even outside the country. India, China and other countries trust him as the most reliable and able leader. Though he is blamed to be very close to India, he has been able to maintain balanced relations with both the neighbours. Indian Prime Minister Dr Man Mohan Singh came to welcome him to the airport when he visited India two years ago. Indian Prime Minister does not go to airport to welcome any leader except US president. It is due to the high regards for Koirala.
When Non Aligned Movement summit was held in Durban, South Africa, Nelson Mandela as a president was the chairman of NAM. He had to greet 114 member countries representatives. So it was just hand shake for those leaders. But he gave some time and held talks with Koirala for some minutes. Mandela had held talks with only Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, Cuban President Fidel Castro and Colombia’s president, who was the outgoing chairman of NAM. Nepal’s image enhanced with such event.
Resignation
Despite being in majority, he resigned from the prime minister’s post on moral ground. He resigned when then King Birendra refused to deploy army to quell the Maoists insurgency which had spiralled throughout the country. There was clear conspiracy from the king. The police were not given weapon when the Maoists were attacking police station in many districts of western Nepal. Maoists were getting modern arms and ammunition. Maoists were raising war to end monarchy but the monarchy was being the wall to stop any measures targeted to defeat them. So he resigned on moral ground.
When his own party MPs were absent and defeated the government’s programme in the first elected parliament, Koirala called the meeting of the parliamentary party. He had the support of the majority of the MPs of his party. At least 74 MPs expressed their support and 36 were against him. He resigned from the post of prime minister and called election to maintain the norms of democracy. Koirala had the largest number of MPs’ support than the main opposition party UML with 69 MPs. And still he was the parliamentary party leader. So his decision was constitutional and valid in democracy.
Exposure of Palace Conspiracy
In the view of Koirala, Maoist rebellion was a conspiracy initiated to end democracy by the palace. Close aides of Koirala say: he had expressed his views even during the meeting with then King Birendra. Maoist’s movement was launched when Koirala was not in power. When he became prime minister, he started the policy of dialogue with the Maoists but the Maoists refused to hold talks with Koirala saying him the “Fascist.” Maoists wanted to hold talks with the government if Koirala was not in power- so was the desire of the palace. It was a clear indication of palace’s motive. Palace wanted some other prime minister instead of Koirala because he was not ready to compromise anything regarding democracy. The palace was playing double role to end democracy in Nepal. It was encouraging the Maoists on the one hand and inciting the government to suppress the Maoists movement on the other.
Koirala neither said Maoists are terrorists nor them to be democrats but he brought them to the peace process. Koirala was accused of being Fascist by Maoists. Maoists refused to hold talks with him. He resigned. Talks failed. Maoists needed him to bring them from the forest. He extended his hands again. He convinced them. Brought them and led them. And became their leader too.
Koirala's Weaknesses
On the contrary, Koirala has many weaknesses too. He could not expose the palace conspiracy against democracy though he became prime minister for many years in Nepal. In private, time and again he said that there was conspiracy of the palace to brandish Maoists but he did not reveal it publicly.
He became too liberal to the Maoists as he could not understand their strategies. His party lost the election despite his role in the peace process.
Koirala was the prime minister when the royal palace massacre happened but he could not bring out the truth to the public. He said that he would expose palace massacre but he never did. Koirala knew the incident only after 3 hours when the physical distance of his residence and the palace is less than 5 minutes. He was in a state of arrest at the army hospital and all the fingers were pointed to the relatives of Birendra but Koirala turned deaf and did not do anything. He could at least form a parliamentary committee, bring foreign independent investigators, properly investigate the incident and bring the truth to the public. He failed to do so due to his feel of affection for the post.
There is accusation to Koirala running the party like a private family. He has compelled the Prime Minister to appoint his daughter as deputy prime minister despite being so many able leaders in his party and in his Koirala clan too. He takes the decision on his own without consulting the senior leaders of the party and the most serious blame is: Koirala was too liberal toward Maoists. It became true too. After the election, Maoists deceived him. However, some political observers say it was the compulsion of the time.
Despite these weaknesses, any of the contemporary political leaders has not been able to do what Koirala did despite his age and all other adverse circumstances. There was the need of able leadership for the party; there was only Koirala who could fulfil all these responsibilities effectively. Some were tested and failed. Some could not take the responsibility. Then such accusation does not have any foundation. And all political party leaders cannot be Mandela. Nepal’s situation was different. There was monarchy creating instability and there are many parties with various interests and affiliation in this country between India and China.
In view of Koirala’s contribution to Nepal’s democratic movement, abolition of monarchy, bringing Maoists to the peace process and ending conflict, he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.
Also click the following links to read this article:
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/4889948-why-does-girija-koirala-deserve-nobel-peace-prize
http://www.dcnepal.me/press_release_english.php?nid=802